sexuality, rather than promoting healthy body approval.50
36. Complete nudity is antithetic to the elaborate semi- full news of the fashion industry.
Julian Robinson observes, "modesty is so intertwined with sexual desire and the need for sexual display--
fighting but at the exact same time re kindling this want--a self-perpetuating process is necessarily set in motion. In
fact modesty can never really attain its greatest end except through its disappearance. Concealing under the cloak of
http://tvamateur.net there are to be located many essential elements of the sexual urge itself." 51
37. Garments often focuses attention on the genitals and sexual arousal, rather than away from them. 52
At various times in Western history distinct parts of female anatomy have been eroticized: abdomens and
thighs in the Renaissance; buttocks, breasts, and thighs by the late 1800s (and comparatively diminutive waistlines and
Abdomens). Knickers layout has historically highlighted these erogenous body parts: corsets in the 1800s deemphasized
the midriff and underscored the breasts--using materials including whalebone and steel; the crinoline in
the mid 1800s emphasized the waistline; along with the bustle, appearing in 1868, stressed the buttocks.53 Bathing suit
design now focuses attention on the breasts and pubic region.
E.B. Hurlock writes: "When primitive individuals are unaccustomed to wearing clothing, putting it on for the
first time does not reduce their immorality, as the ladies of missionary societies think it will. It's just the
Contrary effect. It attracts attention to the human body particularly for those parts of it that are covered for the very first time." 54
Rob Boyte notes wryly that "textile folks, when they do strip in front of others, generally do it for fire, and see
the bikini layout tan-lines enticing. This is reminiscent of the scarification practiced by primitive societies, and
shows how clothing patterns become a fetish of the body." 55 Havelock Ellis writes: "In Case the conquest of sexual
Want were the first and last factor of life it would be more practical to forbid clothing than to forbid
nakedness." 56
38. The fashion industry depends on the sex appeal of garments.
Peter Fryer writes: "The changes in women's fashions are basically determined by the requirement to maintain
men's sexual interest, and so to transfer the principal zone of sensual display once a given element of the body has
been saturated with attractive power to the point of satiation. . . . Each new fashion seeks to arouse interest in a new
erogenous zone to replace the zone which, for the time being, is played out." 57
39. Differences of clothes between the sexes focus attention on sex differences.58
Shrink J.C. Flugel writes: "There appears to be (notably in modern life) no vital factor in the
nature, customs, or functions of both sexes that would necessitate a dramatic difference of costume--other than the
desire to accentuate gender differences themselves; an accentuation that predominantly functions the end of more easily and
Often arousing sexual passion." 59
40. Many psychologists believe that clothes may initially have developed, in part, as a means of
Concentrating sexual focus.60
41. I've been posting on nude beach BB for ages, and believed it was time to get a 'chance' at these contests to see how I'd go. I am aware that at 38 I 'm hardly a chance against the beautiful young girls who post, but hey - you only live once! So, here goes. My favourite 'alluring backside' photos that I could locate. I hope you all appreciate them and at least comment back to me for a chat! Oh, by the way - I am an aussie, so all you aussie naturist fans out there say HI and I'll write back to you too. Fingers crossed for some fine remarks http://tvamateur.net along with a few votes. Love, Fruswife. P.S. I hope you like heels, cos that's the only shoes I wear!
Partial clothing is more sexually stimulating (in often unhealthy ways) than full nudity.
Anne Hollander writes: "The more essential clothing is, the more significance attaches to its absence and the
more knowledge is generated about any relationship between both states." 61 Elizabeth B. Hurlock notes that "it is
unquestion
36. Complete nudity is antithetic to the elaborate semi- full news of the fashion industry.
Julian Robinson observes, "modesty is so intertwined with sexual desire and the need for sexual display--
fighting but at the exact same time re kindling this want--a self-perpetuating process is necessarily set in motion. In
fact modesty can never really attain its greatest end except through its disappearance. Concealing under the cloak of
http://tvamateur.net there are to be located many essential elements of the sexual urge itself." 51
37. Garments often focuses attention on the genitals and sexual arousal, rather than away from them. 52
At various times in Western history distinct parts of female anatomy have been eroticized: abdomens and
thighs in the Renaissance; buttocks, breasts, and thighs by the late 1800s (and comparatively diminutive waistlines and
Abdomens). Knickers layout has historically highlighted these erogenous body parts: corsets in the 1800s deemphasized
the midriff and underscored the breasts--using materials including whalebone and steel; the crinoline in
the mid 1800s emphasized the waistline; along with the bustle, appearing in 1868, stressed the buttocks.53 Bathing suit
design now focuses attention on the breasts and pubic region.
E.B. Hurlock writes: "When primitive individuals are unaccustomed to wearing clothing, putting it on for the
first time does not reduce their immorality, as the ladies of missionary societies think it will. It's just the
Contrary effect. It attracts attention to the human body particularly for those parts of it that are covered for the very first time." 54
Rob Boyte notes wryly that "textile folks, when they do strip in front of others, generally do it for fire, and see
the bikini layout tan-lines enticing. This is reminiscent of the scarification practiced by primitive societies, and
shows how clothing patterns become a fetish of the body." 55 Havelock Ellis writes: "In Case the conquest of sexual
Want were the first and last factor of life it would be more practical to forbid clothing than to forbid
nakedness." 56
38. The fashion industry depends on the sex appeal of garments.
Peter Fryer writes: "The changes in women's fashions are basically determined by the requirement to maintain
men's sexual interest, and so to transfer the principal zone of sensual display once a given element of the body has
been saturated with attractive power to the point of satiation. . . . Each new fashion seeks to arouse interest in a new
erogenous zone to replace the zone which, for the time being, is played out." 57
39. Differences of clothes between the sexes focus attention on sex differences.58
Shrink J.C. Flugel writes: "There appears to be (notably in modern life) no vital factor in the
nature, customs, or functions of both sexes that would necessitate a dramatic difference of costume--other than the
desire to accentuate gender differences themselves; an accentuation that predominantly functions the end of more easily and
Often arousing sexual passion." 59
40. Many psychologists believe that clothes may initially have developed, in part, as a means of
Concentrating sexual focus.60
41. I've been posting on nude beach BB for ages, and believed it was time to get a 'chance' at these contests to see how I'd go. I am aware that at 38 I 'm hardly a chance against the beautiful young girls who post, but hey - you only live once! So, here goes. My favourite 'alluring backside' photos that I could locate. I hope you all appreciate them and at least comment back to me for a chat! Oh, by the way - I am an aussie, so all you aussie naturist fans out there say HI and I'll write back to you too. Fingers crossed for some fine remarks http://tvamateur.net along with a few votes. Love, Fruswife. P.S. I hope you like heels, cos that's the only shoes I wear!
Partial clothing is more sexually stimulating (in often unhealthy ways) than full nudity.
Anne Hollander writes: "The more essential clothing is, the more significance attaches to its absence and the
more knowledge is generated about any relationship between both states." 61 Elizabeth B. Hurlock notes that "it is
unquestion