Patients in danger for blood clots and pulmonary embolism who receive an IVC filter implant may face a heightened risk of severe complications, including inability or difficulty in removing the apparatus, implant failure, device migration, tipping, perforation, deep vein thrombosis and injury to internal organs.
A variety of product liability suits have already been brought against the manufacturers of IVC filters, around injuries allegedly due to the controversial medical devices.
If you believe you've been adversely affected by side effects of the Bard G2 apparatus, the Bard Recovery device, or another potentially dangerous inferior vena cava filter on the market, contact a reputable product liability attorney now for legal help. With a qualified IVC filter harm attorney on your side, you can ensure your legal rights are protected, and pursue Cook IVC Filter lawsuit and your family deserve for your injuries, medical expenses, and emotional trauma.
How Does an IVC Filter Work?
An inferior vena cava (IVC) filter is a small cone-shaped medical device planted in the inferior vena cava, which is the largest vein in the body and is responsible for taking deoxygenated blood from the lower extremities of the body to the right atrium of the heart and the lungs. IVC filters are made to catch an embolism, a blood clot that has broken loose from one of the deep veins in the legs, and prevent it from traveling to the heart and lungs, thus reducing the risk of stroke, pulmonary embolism, and other blood clot-related injuries. The filter is made to trap clots and allow blood to continue to flow.
Inferior vena cava filters are commonly used in patients for whom anticoagulant therapy is improper, or who are at a high risk for blood clots and pulmonary embolism, but who are not able to take blood thinner medications. Without the IVC filter in place, these patients may suffer a pulmonary embolism, which occurs when an embolism (blood clot, gas bubble, fat globule or foreign material in the bloodstream) blocks one or both pulmonary arteries, preventing deoxygenated blood from being carried to the lungs. Yet, recent studies have revealed that IVC filters may actually present a risk of serious side effects for patients, maybe caused by the medical device fracturing, perforating the IVC, and traveling to other parts of the body, or malfunctioning.
Possible Side Effects of IVC Filters
Though they're advertised as “retrievable” apparatus, reports of removable IVC filters migrating out of position and causing serious injuries or even death, have been rising recently. Based on recent IVC filter side effect studies and reports of adverse events in consumers, patients who receive an IVC filter to reduce their risk of blood clots and pulmonary embolism may be at risk for the following complications:
• Apparatus break
• Migration of the body of the filter to other parts
• Perforation of the inferior vena cava
• Harm to nearby organs
• Lower-limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
• An accumulation of clots in the filter that blocks the flow of blood to the heart
• The inability to recover part of or all of the filter
• A build-up of fluid around the heart
Generally of IVC filter failure, the miniature metal device breaks, and fragments of the apparatus embolize, or migrate to the heart, lungs, kidneys, liver or other organs. Once the fractured bits of the filter have embedded themselves in the organ, patients may begin to experience complications like severe pain, bleeding, perforation of the organ, and other potentially life threatening injuries.
A Reputable IVC Filter Attorney Can Help
Several product liability lawsuits have already been brought against C.R. Bard and other IVC filter makers, on behalf of consumers who consider they have suffered serious injuries caused by the controversial medical devices. Lawsuits brought against the makers of retrievable IVC filters all involve similar allegations, including claims the manufacturing company: developed and sold a defective and unreasonably dangerous medical device; failed to adequately study the long term hazards of IVC filters; understood or should have known about the prospect of the filters to cause serious injuries; neglected to supply FDA and the people with sufficient warnings about IVC filter complications; continued to market IVC filters as safe and powerful, despite
A variety of product liability suits have already been brought against the manufacturers of IVC filters, around injuries allegedly due to the controversial medical devices.
If you believe you've been adversely affected by side effects of the Bard G2 apparatus, the Bard Recovery device, or another potentially dangerous inferior vena cava filter on the market, contact a reputable product liability attorney now for legal help. With a qualified IVC filter harm attorney on your side, you can ensure your legal rights are protected, and pursue Cook IVC Filter lawsuit and your family deserve for your injuries, medical expenses, and emotional trauma.
How Does an IVC Filter Work?
An inferior vena cava (IVC) filter is a small cone-shaped medical device planted in the inferior vena cava, which is the largest vein in the body and is responsible for taking deoxygenated blood from the lower extremities of the body to the right atrium of the heart and the lungs. IVC filters are made to catch an embolism, a blood clot that has broken loose from one of the deep veins in the legs, and prevent it from traveling to the heart and lungs, thus reducing the risk of stroke, pulmonary embolism, and other blood clot-related injuries. The filter is made to trap clots and allow blood to continue to flow.
Inferior vena cava filters are commonly used in patients for whom anticoagulant therapy is improper, or who are at a high risk for blood clots and pulmonary embolism, but who are not able to take blood thinner medications. Without the IVC filter in place, these patients may suffer a pulmonary embolism, which occurs when an embolism (blood clot, gas bubble, fat globule or foreign material in the bloodstream) blocks one or both pulmonary arteries, preventing deoxygenated blood from being carried to the lungs. Yet, recent studies have revealed that IVC filters may actually present a risk of serious side effects for patients, maybe caused by the medical device fracturing, perforating the IVC, and traveling to other parts of the body, or malfunctioning.
Possible Side Effects of IVC Filters
Though they're advertised as “retrievable” apparatus, reports of removable IVC filters migrating out of position and causing serious injuries or even death, have been rising recently. Based on recent IVC filter side effect studies and reports of adverse events in consumers, patients who receive an IVC filter to reduce their risk of blood clots and pulmonary embolism may be at risk for the following complications:
• Apparatus break
• Migration of the body of the filter to other parts
• Perforation of the inferior vena cava
• Harm to nearby organs
• Lower-limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
• An accumulation of clots in the filter that blocks the flow of blood to the heart
• The inability to recover part of or all of the filter
• A build-up of fluid around the heart
Generally of IVC filter failure, the miniature metal device breaks, and fragments of the apparatus embolize, or migrate to the heart, lungs, kidneys, liver or other organs. Once the fractured bits of the filter have embedded themselves in the organ, patients may begin to experience complications like severe pain, bleeding, perforation of the organ, and other potentially life threatening injuries.
A Reputable IVC Filter Attorney Can Help
Several product liability lawsuits have already been brought against C.R. Bard and other IVC filter makers, on behalf of consumers who consider they have suffered serious injuries caused by the controversial medical devices. Lawsuits brought against the makers of retrievable IVC filters all involve similar allegations, including claims the manufacturing company: developed and sold a defective and unreasonably dangerous medical device; failed to adequately study the long term hazards of IVC filters; understood or should have known about the prospect of the filters to cause serious injuries; neglected to supply FDA and the people with sufficient warnings about IVC filter complications; continued to market IVC filters as safe and powerful, despite