Socio economic and political concerns of resourcing skill and leadership

Table 1.
    Percentage of respondents assessing each SB 431542 in relation to assessment breadth (n = 54). Breadth refers to the number of elements occurring in the first table row that each survey respondent assessed. Shading indicates the least commonly assessed element.Biophysical conditionSocio-economic conditionObjectivesPlansResourcesActivitiesOutputsOutcomes8 elements (n = 3)100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%7 elements (n = 2)100%0%100%100%100%100%100%100%6 elements (n = 3)67%0%100%67%100%100%67%100%5 elements (n = 4)75%25%100%74%25%75%50%75%4 elements (n = 6)33%33%67%50%50%33%50%83%3 elements (n = 14)64%7%29%43%7%57%36%57%2 elements (n = 5)60%20%20%0%0%60%40%0%1 element (n = 17)59%0%0%6%0%0%6%24%Overall (n = 54)63%15%39%37%24%44%37%52%Full-size tableTable optionsView in workspaceDownload as CSV
From Table 1, it is evident that socio-economic condition is consistently under-assessed in relation to other elements. There also appears to be a trend in the likelihood of dropping the assessment of resources and activities as breadth of assessment decreases, followed by objectives, management plans and outputs, and then outcomes. This pattern in assessment breadth has ramifications for adaptive management, by limiting the types of management decisions that monitoring and evaluation can inform.